From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34902-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31095 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 20:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31053 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 20:16:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 20:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030510201601.31043.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: c/10260: alloca 0xFFFFFFFF and -fstack-check
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00990.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/10260; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, user42@zip.com.au
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/10260: alloca 0xFFFFFFFF and -fstack-check
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:08:34 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=10260
 
 Looks like this behavior still exists in 3.2.3, 3.3 branch and mainline  
 (20030509).
 
 Dara