From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20851 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 21:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20761 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 21:36:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510213602.20735.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: ada/5978: A short-circuit return statement should be added to a-ngcefu.adb Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01011.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/5978; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, zhenggen@public1.ptt.js.cn Cc: Subject: Re: ada/5978: A short-circuit return statement should be added to a-ngcefu.adb Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:32:46 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=5978 Hello, This bug was reported against sources which are now over a year out of date. Would it be possible for you to determine if this problem still occurs on a more current version of gcc (ie 3.2.3)? Thanks, Dara