From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34929-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13004 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 21:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12985 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 21:56:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030510215600.12984.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: target/10733: Modulus bug
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01017.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/10733; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: John Bright <jbright@winfordeng.com>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/10733: Modulus bug
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT)

 Sorry to keep asking for more, but could you also
 include the preprocessed source? Thanks.
 
 Dara
 
 P.S. If I send you assembly output from 3.3 and
 mainline, would you be able to test it? That way we
 can determine if the bug's fixed in current sources.
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com