From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9370 invoked by alias); 11 May 2003 08:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9353 invoked by uid 71); 11 May 2003 08:56:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 08:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030511085601.9352.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dan Nicolaescu Subject: Re: optimization/5739: [sparc] "const" and "pure" function attributes pessimize code Reply-To: Dan Nicolaescu X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01058.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/5739; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dan Nicolaescu To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/5739: [sparc] "const" and "pure" function attributes pessimize code Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 01:52:26 -0700 I can confirm that the problem is still present in mainline cvs. Both in 32 and 64-bit sparc configurations. It also occurs for x86, but the difference in generated code is much smaller.