From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13969 invoked by alias); 11 May 2003 21:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13903 invoked by uid 71); 11 May 2003 21:16:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030511211601.13878.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Zidlicky Subject: Re: middle-end/7594: [m68k] ICE on legal code associated with simplify-rtx Reply-To: Richard Zidlicky X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01088.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR middle-end/7594; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Zidlicky To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, law@redhat.com Subject: Re: middle-end/7594: [m68k] ICE on legal code associated with simplify-rtx Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:37:46 +0200 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:34:25PM -0700, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > trail&database=gcc&pr=7594 Hi, > I can confirm that this bug is still present on 3.2 and 3.3 branch but > does not occur on mainline (20030508) gcc cross compiler. Jeff Law, > you're listed as m68k maintainer. Would there be any interest in fixing > this in the 3.3 branch after 3.3.0? Thanks, thanks for looking at it. The bug is pretty severe, not only did it break glibc but even medium sized packages won´t compile without a fix. I would certainly be very interested to know if my patch is correct. Richard