From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3750 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 03:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3701 invoked by uid 71); 12 May 2003 03:16:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 03:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030512031600.3700.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: java/1308: It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files. Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01104.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/1308; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org, mdejong@cygnus.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: java/1308: It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files. Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:06:20 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=1308 Hello, this report was made against gcc pre 3.0 cvs. Does anybody know whether this problem has been addressed since? Thanks, Dara