From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35020-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20622 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 07:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20514 invoked by uid 71); 12 May 2003 07:16:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 07:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030512071601.20467.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: ada/10671: gcc ignors named notation for pragma arguments
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01109.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR ada/10671; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: berndtrog@yahoo.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ada/10671: gcc ignors named notation for pragma arguments
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 00:08:33 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=10671
 
 Hello,
 
 I can confirm this behavior on gcc 3.2.3 and mainline (20030510).
 
 Dara