From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22177 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 12:15:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9507 invoked by uid 71); 12 May 2003 12:06:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030512120604.9506.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andreas Jaeger Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken Reply-To: Andreas Jaeger X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01213.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/5200; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andreas Jaeger To: Steven Bosscher Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@redhat.com, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, Zdenek Dvorak Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:58:57 +0200 Steven Bosscher writes: > Hi, > > Nathaneal Nerode asked for confirmation of this PR in early January, > but there was no reply. > > Usually that would mean "close it, no feedback for more than three > months". But this is special because so many people have looked at > it and because Zdenek was working on a store motion rewrite some > time ago. > > Can somebody look at it and see if the problem still exists, and change > the status of the PR accordingly (ie. analyzed or closed)? Zdenek is on vacation right now and will be back next month. Please remind him again, when he's back. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5200 Thanks for taking care of this, I agree this is the right way for this bug, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj