From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28912 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 13:56:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28831 invoked by uid 71); 12 May 2003 13:56:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030512135602.28829.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Joel Sherrill Subject: Re: ada/8344: mips-rtems build problem Reply-To: Joel Sherrill X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01228.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/8344; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Joel Sherrill To: Laurent GUERBY Cc: Dara Hazeghi , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, joel@OARcorp.com Subject: Re: ada/8344: mips-rtems build problem Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 08:54:08 -0500 Laurent GUERBY wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 21:02, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > > trail&database=gcc&pr=8344 > > > > Hello, > > > > this PR lists a number of patches that appear to have been applied. Is > > this so? If so, can anyone confirm that the bug in question no longer > > appears? Thanks, > > The problem (ada/final.c => ada/adafinal.c) has been fixed for 3.2, 3.3 > branches, mainline and ACT sources, I'm closing it, thanks for reminding > us. Laurent is correct. This is fixed and we incldue Ada in the mips-rtems RPMs. Sorry this was still open. > Laurent -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985