public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c/10719: invalid code generated (x86, "int $5") with __builtin_va_arg(va, char); Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:46:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030512144601.27370.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c/10719; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> To: sbiallas@online-club.de Cc: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, sb@biallas.net, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10719: invalid code generated (x86, "int $5") with __builtin_va_arg(va, char); Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:45:24 +0100 (BST) On Mon, 12 May 2003 sbiallas@online-club.de wrote: > I can't agree with this: gcc shouldn't generate > invalid code on purpose. It knows there is an > error and should generate an error and not a > warning. The warning is misleading (it sounds like > gcc found a problem and corrected it) and will > probably not recognized. Please read the response to Defect Report #109. This code only yields undefined behavior if it is ever executed, and it might not be, so GCC must not yield an error. To quote the response: A conforming implementation must not fail to translate a strictly conforming program simply because _some_ possible execution of that program would result in undefined behavior. http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_109.html -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-12 14:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-05-12 14:46 Joseph S. Myers [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-05-12 13:56 sbiallas 2003-05-12 3:03 rth 2003-05-09 20:46 Andrew Pinski 2003-05-09 20:36 sb
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030512144601.27370.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=jsm28@cam.ac.uk \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).