public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c/10719: invalid code generated (x86, "int $5") with __builtin_va_arg(va, char);
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030512144601.27370.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
The following reply was made to PR c/10719; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: sbiallas@online-club.de
Cc: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, sb@biallas.net,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10719: invalid code generated (x86, "int $5") with
__builtin_va_arg(va, char);
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:45:24 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 12 May 2003 sbiallas@online-club.de wrote:
> I can't agree with this: gcc shouldn't generate
> invalid code on purpose. It knows there is an
> error and should generate an error and not a
> warning. The warning is misleading (it sounds like
> gcc found a problem and corrected it) and will
> probably not recognized.
Please read the response to Defect Report #109. This code only yields
undefined behavior if it is ever executed, and it might not be, so GCC
must not yield an error. To quote the response:
A conforming implementation must not fail to translate a strictly
conforming program simply because _some_ possible execution of that
program would result in undefined behavior.
http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_109.html
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-12 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-12 14:46 Joseph S. Myers [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-12 13:56 sbiallas
2003-05-12 3:03 rth
2003-05-09 20:46 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-09 20:36 sb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030512144601.27370.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=jsm28@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).