From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13980 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 18:19:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28025 invoked by uid 71); 12 May 2003 18:16:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030512181601.27987.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: java/1305: GCJ ignores volatile modifier Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01269.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/1305; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: java/1305: GCJ ignores volatile modifier Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:02:16 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=1305 Hans Boehm says: "I think 1305 still needs to remain open. It's not clear that this can be fixed completely until JSR133 finishes its job, and it becomes clear what the Java memory model really is. (I'm one of the participants, and we have been trying. It's not easy.)" So this PR should stay open. Dara