From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9789 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 00:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9659 invoked by uid 71); 13 May 2003 00:36:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030513003602.9656.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: ada/9519: gnat-3.2: clash of assembler symbols for overloaded names Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01405.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/9519; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, oliver.kellogg@sysde.eads.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: ada/9519: gnat-3.2: clash of assembler symbols for overloaded names Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 17:32:31 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=9519 Hello, I was able to reproduce this problem on gcc 3.2, but on 3.3 branch and mainline (20030510) on i686-linux, the testcase compiled an assembled fine, so it appears that this bug has been fixed. Dara