From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9666 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 14:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9592 invoked by uid 71); 13 May 2003 14:46:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030513144601.9512.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: M1 Philippe Nobili - IRDA Subject: Re: c++/10766: Template instanciation loops forever (-frepo) Reply-To: M1 Philippe Nobili - IRDA X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01484.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10766; it has been noted by GNATS. From: M1 Philippe Nobili - IRDA To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, Philippe Nobili , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10766: Template instanciation loops forever (-frepo) Date: 13 May 2003 16:33:06 +0200 On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 16:24, bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: Template instanciation loops forever (pre-link) > New Synopsis: Template instanciation loops forever (-frepo) > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Tue May 13 14:24:33 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > This doesn't enter an infinite loop on my linux box, but you > don't say which platform you are on. Can you enlighten us? > > Thanks > Wolfgang > Yes, I was a bit too fast on sending the report... Indeed, it works perfectly well on Linux, but enters an infinite loop on sparc-sun-solaris2.8; here is the result of 'g++ -v' that I forgot to join to the mail: ************************************************************************** % g++ -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.3/specs Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 --with-as=/usr/ccs/binn/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --disable-nls Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3 20030509 (prerelease) ******************************************************************************* Sorry for this, Philippe. PS: The same problem occurs with all official releases of gcc since gcc-3.x