From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35400-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18707 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 16:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18621 invoked by uid 71); 13 May 2003 16:16:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030513161601.18620.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: snyder <snyder@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: c++/10761: [3.4 regression] wrong virtual function called
Reply-To: snyder <snyder@fnal.gov>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01488.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10761; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: snyder <snyder@fnal.gov>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nathan@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, snyder@fnal.gov,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10761: [3.4 regression] wrong virtual function called
Date: 13 May 2003 11:12:16 -0500

 >    Nathan, I dimly recall that you fixed something like
 >    this in the early times after the new parser was
 >    merged (or was it Mark?). If you haven't do you recall
 >    who was it?
 
 I submitted two similar PRs earlier, 9415 and 9485.
 Nathan fixed one, Jason fixed the other.
 sss