From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 693 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 17:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 599 invoked by uid 71); 13 May 2003 17:16:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030513171601.597.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01490.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/6937; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: Michael Koch Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:13:12 -0700 On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 03:35 AM, Michael Koch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Montag, 12. Mai 2003 22:04 schrieben Sie: >> Begin forwarded message: >>> From: Dara Hazeghi >>> Date: Mon May 12, 2003 12:39:59 PM US/Pacific >>> To: konqueror@gmx.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org >>> Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from >>> another nested class >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- >>> trail&database=gcc&pr=6937 >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> could the submitter please confirm if this problem still occurs >>> with gcc 3.3 prerelease or mainline cvs? On both I get errors >>> compiling: >>> >>> ./Container.java:1: Class `Container' already defined in >>> Container.java:1. >>> public class Container >>> ^ >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out >>> bash-2.04$ /tmp/dara1/bin/gcj -C Container.java Derived.java >>> ./Container.java:1: error: Class `Container' already defined in >>> Container.java:1. >>> public class Container >>> ^ >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Dara > > Yes I still get the segfault with trunk-cvs from 20030513. > > But I do get an error with JDK 1.4.1 now too. My testcase is obviously > wrong. I think this can be closed. Do you just want to close it, or mark it as an ICE on illegal code? Thanks, Dara