From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16189 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 18:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5290 invoked by uid 71); 13 May 2003 18:06:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030513180603.5288.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Michael Koch Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class Reply-To: Michael Koch X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01502.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/6937; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Koch To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:03:23 +0200 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2003 19:13 schrieb Dara Hazeghi: > On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 03:35 AM, Michael Koch wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Am Montag, 12. Mai 2003 22:04 schrieben Sie: > >> Begin forwarded message: > >>> From: Dara Hazeghi > >>> Date: Mon May 12, 2003 12:39:59 PM US/Pacific > >>> To: konqueror@gmx.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org > >>> Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from > >>> another nested class > >>> > >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit- > >>> trail&database=3Dgcc&pr=3D6937 > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> could the submitter please confirm if this problem still occurs > >>> with gcc 3.3 prerelease or mainline cvs? On both I get errors > >>> compiling: > >>> > >>> ./Container.java:1: Class `Container' already defined in > >>> Container.java:1. > >>> public class Container > >>> ^ > >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out > >>> bash-2.04$ /tmp/dara1/bin/gcj -C Container.java Derived.java > >>> ./Container.java:1: error: Class `Container' already defined in > >>> Container.java:1. > >>> public class Container > >>> ^ > >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Dara > > > > Yes I still get the segfault with trunk-cvs from 20030513. > > > > But I do get an error with JDK 1.4.1 now too. My testcase is > > obviously wrong. I think this can be closed. > > Do you just want to close it, or mark it as an ICE on illegal code? > Thanks, Just close it. I think I remember that Tom said that an ICE on illegal=20 code is okay. Michael =2D --=20 Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+wTNsWSOgCCdjSDsRAoFiAJ4iT0Hjtrfw6ZM/lc37m39dFjq2OgCeOgme ujFxheUeRUa7RiUHO/s7DdU=3D =3DazXx =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----