From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15066 invoked by alias); 13 May 2003 18:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15026 invoked by uid 71); 13 May 2003 18:56:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030513185601.15006.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: optimization/7270: Redundant compares not eliminated on x86. Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01517.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7270; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, anamax@earthlink.net Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/7270: Redundant compares not eliminated on x86. Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:52:35 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=7270 Hello, this report is against gcc 3.1 which is now a bit outdated. Would it be possible for you to test this on gcc 3.3 prerelease or cvs, and see if this problem still occurs? Also, can you provide a sample of the assembly which is unsatisfactory, and specifically note the unsatisfactory parts? Thanks, Dara