public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shrao@nyx.net
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: mark@codesourcery.com
Subject: other/10777: gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030514062752.30550.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)


>Number:         10777
>Category:       other
>Synopsis:       gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed May 14 06:36:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Shrisha Rao
>Release:        gcc 3.3-prerelease
>Organization:
>Environment:
MacOS X 10.2.6 (Darwin 6.6)
>Description:
When gcc 3.3 is compiled using Apple's gcc 3.1 (December 2002 Developer Tools) it compiles fine with just the usual warnings.  But when it is bootstrapped using itself (i.e., using a gcc 3.3 compiled from Apple's gcc), there is the odd warning message which repeats as often as the flag is used:

gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'

One example:

gcc   -g -no-cpp-precomp -DHAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZERS=0 -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long   -DHAVE_CONFIG_H    -I. -I. -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/config -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/../include -c insn-recog.c \
  -o insn-recog.o
gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'

The bootstrap does run to completion nonetheless, and there are no tangible consequences of this warning that I have been able to find.  It still is a wonder why gcc 3.3 does not have -no-cpp-precomp enabled.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-14  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-14  6:36 shrao [this message]
2003-05-14  7:36 Dara Hazeghi
2003-05-14 12:06 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-14 14:10 bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030514062752.30550.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=shrao@nyx.net \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).