From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17374 invoked by alias); 14 May 2003 10:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17310 invoked by uid 48); 14 May 2003 10:48:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030514104809.17309.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, omarbeo@hotmail.com From: giovannibajo@libero.it Reply-To: giovannibajo@libero.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, omarbeo@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10772: Result differences between debug and optmize libs on linux; and with sol/nt on optimize mode X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01607.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Result differences between debug and optmize libs on linux; and with sol/nt on optimize mode State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bajo State-Changed-When: Wed May 14 10:48:08 2003 State-Changed-Why: See Dara's question. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10772