From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35560-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3267 invoked by alias); 14 May 2003 14:46:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3246 invoked by uid 71); 14 May 2003 14:46:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030514144600.3244.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Pete Gonzalez <gonz@ratloop.com>
Subject: Re: c++/10776: [3.3 regression] Large aggregate initializers
  cause GCC to fail
Reply-To: Pete Gonzalez <gonz@ratloop.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01648.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10776; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Pete Gonzalez <gonz@ratloop.com>
To: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
 Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10776: [3.3 regression] Large aggregate initializers
  cause GCC to fail
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:40:59 -0400

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10776 
 
 
 The problem seems to be the "&data::tex::tackytexture" expression
 inside the array, i.e. if I replace all instances with "0", the
 code compiles successfully:
 
 >static const TOutdoorMapData::TTriangleItem data_triangleItems[2382] = {
 >   {
 >     0, // &data::tex::tackytexture,
 >     0,
 >     { { 87, 104, 0, -778 },
 >       { 95, 106, 21, -799 },
 >       { 89, 109, 0, -799 } }
 >   },
 
 However, this crashes:
 
 >const TBitmap *nullBmp = 0;
 >
 >static const TOutdoorMapData::TTriangleItem data_triangleItems[2382] = {
 >   {
 >     nullBmp,
 >     0,
 >     { { 87, 104, 0, -778 },
 >       { 95, 106, 21, -799 },
 >       { 89, 109, 0, -799 } }
 >   },
 
 I'll let you know if I find anything else.  Thanks for the quick response.
 
 -Pete