From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6270 invoked by alias); 14 May 2003 15:14:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6243 invoked by uid 48); 14 May 2003 15:14:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030514151449.6242.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, omarbeo@hotmail.com From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, omarbeo@hotmail.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10772: Result differences between debug and optmize libs on linux; and with sol/nt on optimize mode X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01650.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Result differences between debug and optmize libs on linux; and with sol/nt on optimize mode State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed May 14 15:14:48 2003 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug. Optimized and debug compilations give the same result is -ffloat-store is used. On NT, a similar accuracy truncation mechanism is used by default. On Solaris, all accuracy is 64bit. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10772