From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21024 invoked by alias); 14 May 2003 19:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21006 invoked by uid 71); 14 May 2003 19:16:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 19:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030514191601.21005.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Enrique Perez-Terron Subject: Re: optimization/10752: -O2 generates loop assembly instruction with label too far away Reply-To: Enrique Perez-Terron X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01687.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10752; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Enrique Perez-Terron To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10752: -O2 generates loop assembly instruction with label too far away Date: 14 May 2003 21:10:53 +0200 On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 19:11, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > trail&database=gcc&pr=10752 > > Hello, > > I cannot reproduce this problem on gcc 3.2, 3.3 branch (20030510) or > mainline (20030510). Please note that gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red > Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) is not an officially released version. Can you > please try the code in question with 3.2.3 or 3.3 prerelease, and > report whether this problem still occurs? Thanks, > > Dara You are right. I downloaded gcc-3.2.3, and did: $ ./configure --prefix=/home/enrique/root/usr $ make bootstrap $ export PATH=/home/enrique/root/usr/bin:$PATH $ FLAGS="... pasted in from the mail I sent to you ..." $ gcc $FLAGS -c skgepnmi.i and got no error messages. Just to be sure I was testing properly, I reverted PATH to the original, and repeated the compile $ export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin $ gcc $FLAGS -c skgepnmi.i and got the error messages as described. It seems like I have to send a bug report to Red Hat. Thanks, Enrique