From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35629-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8061 invoked by alias); 14 May 2003 23:06:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7965 invoked by uid 71); 14 May 2003 23:06:03 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 23:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030514230603.7963.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gdr@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/10771: [3.4 regression] [diagnostic] Unreadable error message for illegal specialization
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01719.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10771; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <bangerth@dealii.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gdr@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<giovannibajo@libero.it>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10771: [3.4 regression] [diagnostic] Unreadable error message for illegal specialization
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 01:01:27 +0200

 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 
 >     Confirmed. Though it's worse: gcc3.2.3 and 3.3 ICE on this
 >     code. 3.4 doesn't any more. But I think that we have other
 >     reports about the ICE, so we may keep this PR just for the
 >     problem with the diagnostics. Is this right Giovanni?
 
 Exactly. This is what I meant at the start of the PR description.
 
 Giovanni Bajo