From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35643-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24545 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 00:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24506 invoked by uid 71); 15 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030515000600.24505.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/9771: [x86] wrong ebp optimisation
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01732.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/9771; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/9771: [x86] wrong ebp optimisation
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:03:56 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=9771
 
 Hello,
 
 I can confirm that with gcc 3.2, 3.3 branch and mainline  (20030511) I  
 can reproduce the behavior in this report.
 
 Dara