From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2176 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 00:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2159 invoked by uid 71); 15 May 2003 00:36:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 00:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030515003601.2156.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01738.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/10213; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: jh@suse.cz, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, snyder@fnal.gov Cc: Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:29:42 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=10213 Hello, with gcc 3.2, 3.3 branch and mainline cvs (20030511), I get the same output on the first and second lines with this testcase (when compiled with -O2 -fPIC). ie 3.4 gives: 402341ec 402341ec It seems like the bug has been fixed. Is that true? Thanks, Dara