From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35653-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6082 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 01:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5988 invoked by uid 71); 15 May 2003 01:06:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 01:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030515010600.5986.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: snyder <snyder@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC
Reply-To: snyder <snyder@fnal.gov>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01741.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/10213; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: snyder <snyder@fnal.gov>
To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc: jh@suse.cz, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC
Date: 14 May 2003 20:00:00 -0500

 >It seems like the bug has been fixed. Is that true? Thanks,
 
 Yes, it was fixed on the mainline, i think by turning off
 the fast prologues.  (I had thought that the PR was closed
 too; maybe not..)
 sss