From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32493 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 04:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32473 invoked by uid 71); 15 May 2003 04:36:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 04:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030515043601.32471.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gdr@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: c++/10784: [diagnostic] Warning about choosing custom operator over copy constructor cannot be turned off (and it's useless in the first place) Reply-To: Gabriel Dos Reis X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01753.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10784; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: giovannibajo@libero.it Cc: Serge.Bogdanov@intel.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, giovannibajo@libero.it Subject: Re: c++/10784: [diagnostic] Warning about choosing custom operator over copy constructor cannot be turned off (and it's useless in the first place) Date: 15 May 2003 06:28:40 +0200 giovannibajo@libero.it writes: | Synopsis: [diagnostic] Warning about choosing custom operator over copy constructor cannot be turned off (and it's useless in the first place) | | Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr | Responsible-Changed-By: bajo | Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 14 16:24:42 2003 | Responsible-Changed-Why: | Diagnostic mantainer. What do you think of this, Gaby? Yes, this sems to be a pointless warning. -- Gaby