From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21272 invoked by alias); 16 May 2003 18:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21245 invoked by uid 71); 16 May 2003 18:06:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030516180600.21244.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Benjamin Kosnik Subject: Re: libstdc++/9876: filebuf::sputc more than 10% slower than putc Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01870.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/9876; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benjamin Kosnik To: Paolo Carlini Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9876: filebuf::sputc more than 10% slower than putc Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:58:03 -0500 >Just a note for GNATS. We are making progress on this one, >which, as is, probably could even be closed: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-04/msg00245.html > >Paolo. Yeah, I agree. (I went through this last night, actually as part of scoping GNATS for performance issues). The getc_unlocked commentary is interesting though. Where to save it? Maybe put this into suspend? We should probably do a cleanup of GNATS to ease the transition to bugzilla. I plan on doing my part this afternoon. best, benjamin