From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9106 invoked by alias); 16 May 2003 20:39:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9058 invoked by uid 48); 16 May 2003 20:39:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030516203952.9056.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bartoldeman@users.sourceforge.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bartoldeman@users.sourceforge.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01893.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: Anonymous union regression between gcc 3.2 and 3.3 New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri May 16 20:39:51 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. It worked up to 3.2, but no longer in 3.3 and 3.4. It works again if "union type {..." is replaced with just "union { ...". http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10826