From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5215 invoked by alias); 16 May 2003 23:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5069 invoked by uid 71); 16 May 2003 23:36:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030516233601.5067.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: libstdc++/10508: libstdc++ from gcc 3.2.3 failed to boostrap on OpenBSD 3.2 Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01903.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10508; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/10508: libstdc++ from gcc 3.2.3 failed to boostrap on OpenBSD 3.2 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 16:28:39 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=10508 Uhm, separate srcdir and objdir are mentioned, but not _required_. As my post on gcc mailing list last week indicated, we either need to support this, or not. Note that I have seen no problems with 3.3 yet when doing this. Dara