From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35817-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29344 invoked by alias); 16 May 2003 23:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29253 invoked by uid 71); 16 May 2003 23:46:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 23:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030516234602.29217.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10508: libstdc++ from gcc 3.2.3 failed to boostrap on
 OpenBSD 3.2
Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01905.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10508; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10508: libstdc++ from gcc 3.2.3 failed to boostrap on
 OpenBSD 3.2
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:40:26 -0500

 >Uhm, separate srcdir and objdir are mentioned, but not _required_. As  
 >my post on gcc mailing list last week indicated, we either need to  
 >support this, or not. Note that I have seen no problems with 3.3 yet  
 >when doing this.
 
 Can I close this?
 
 -benjamin