public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: target/6039: [ARM] interrupt attribute generats wrong code Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 02:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030517025601.26819.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR target/6039; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com> To: tori@unhappy.mine.nu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/6039: [ARM] interrupt attribute generats wrong code Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 19:48:47 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=6039 Hello, gcc 3.0.4 and 3.1 cvs are rather ancient at this point. Would it be possible for you to check whether this problem is still present. I don't know much about arm assembly, but this is what 3.3 produces: .file "junk.c" .text .align 2 .global foo .type foo, %function foo: @ Interrupt Service Routine. @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 12 @ frame_needed = 1, uses_anonymous_args = 0 str ip, [sp, #-4]! mov ip, sp sub lr, lr, #4 stmfd sp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, fp, ip, lr, pc} sub fp, ip, #4 sub sp, sp, #12 mov r3, #0 str r3, [fp, #-40] mov r3, #0 str r3, [fp, #-44] ldr r2, [fp, #-40] ldr r3, [fp, #-44] add r3, r2, r3 str r3, [fp, #-48] bl bar ldmea fp, {r0, r1, r2, r3, fp, ip, pc}^ .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.3 20030508 (prerelease)" gcc mainline produces: .file "junk.c" .text .align 2 .global foo .type foo, %function foo: @ Interrupt Service Routine. @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 12 @ frame_needed = 1, uses_anonymous_args = 0 str ip, [sp, #-4]! mov ip, sp stmfd sp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, fp, ip, lr, pc} sub fp, ip, #4 sub sp, sp, #12 mov r3, #0 str r3, [fp, #-40] mov r3, #0 str r3, [fp, #-44] ldr r2, [fp, #-40] ldr r3, [fp, #-44] add r3, r2, r3 str r3, [fp, #-48] bl bar ldmea fp, {r0, r1, r2, r3, fp, sp, lr} ldmfd sp!, {ip} subs pc, lr, #4 .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.4 20030508 (experimental)" Can you confirm if these are correct? Thanks, Dara
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-17 2:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-05-17 2:56 Dara Hazeghi [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-05-17 6:58 giovannibajo 2002-04-18 9:03 target/6039: ARM " mmitchel 2002-03-22 7:56 tori
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030517025601.26819.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=dhazeghi@yahoo.com \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).