From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1682 invoked by alias); 17 May 2003 04:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1644 invoked by uid 71); 17 May 2003 04:16:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 04:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030517041601.1638.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Ari Pollak Subject: Re: bootstrap/10811: libjava/libltdl/configure fails Reply-To: Ari Pollak X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01929.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10811; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ari Pollak To: Dara Hazeghi , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/10811: libjava/libltdl/configure fails Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 00:06:43 -0400 Yes, either make bootstrapping or making with CONFIG_SHELL set to ksh makes it run fine. What exactly is the difference in the end result between 'make' and 'make bootstrap'? On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 06:48:26PM -0700, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > > --- Ari Pollak wrote: > > No. However, the exact same system worked with the > > same method under gcc > > 3.2.3. > > Would it be possible for you to check if CONFIG_SHELL > fixes the problem you mentioned? Thanks, >