From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35846-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17346 invoked by alias); 17 May 2003 06:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17332 invoked by uid 71); 17 May 2003 06:26:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 06:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030517062600.17331.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: c/10829: Macros that worked in 2.95.3 don't work in 3.3
Reply-To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01934.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/10829; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: "Aaron Williams" <aaron_williams@net.com>
Cc: aaronw@net.com,  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10829: Macros that worked in 2.95.3 don't work in 3.3
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 23:18:21 -0700

 "Aaron Williams" <aaron_williams@net.com> writes:
 
 > Thanks for the quick response.  I might add that the code I submitted
 > also compiles fine with Sun's Forte 6.1 C++ compiler.
 
 You did get the longer explanation I sent, yes?
 
 zw