From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5822 invoked by alias); 17 May 2003 06:51:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5707 invoked by uid 48); 17 May 2003 06:51:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 06:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030517065124.5706.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: echristo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mburnham@link.com From: echristo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: echristo@gcc.gnu.org, echristo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mburnham@link.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/1698: [MIPS] compiling optimized code using mips4 on R12000 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01940.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [MIPS] compiling optimized code using mips4 on R12000 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: echristo State-Changed-When: Sat May 17 06:51:24 2003 State-Changed-Why: Can you retest this with mainline. I don't have an r12000 machine and the code appears correct (and runs on an r10000 as you noticed). http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1698