From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35921-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4725 invoked by alias); 18 May 2003 02:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4702 invoked by uid 71); 18 May 2003 02:06:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 02:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030518020600.4698.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/10840: any way to catch a segmentation fault error?
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02009.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10840; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: snowboy@orgio.net
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
   "Gcc-Bugs@Gcc. Gnu. Org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/10840: any way to catch a segmentation fault error?
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 22:02:31 -0400

 No, this is a Microsoft extension, use signal(3) to catch seg faults.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 
 PS Can someone close this bug, as this extension is one which has
 been discussed before and decided we do not want it.