public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 19:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030518193600.11972.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --] The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10783; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> To: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Sylvain.Pion@mpi-sb.mpg.de, ncm@cantrip.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/10783: std::vector::reverse_iterator could be smaller Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 21:35:50 +0200 Well, on second thought, and giving justice to the clear explanation in V&J, in their §16.2.2 it is clearly stated that the EBCO has no equivalent for data members: this is reasonable considering that it would create problems with the representation of pointers to members. Therefore reverse_iterator is expected to have the same size of its iterator empty base (thanks to EBCO) + the size of its member current, that is two times the size of a plain iterator. Do you agree? Paolo. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10783
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-18 19:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-05-18 19:36 Paolo Carlini [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-05-18 22:46 Nathan Myers 2003-05-18 18:48 paolo 2003-05-14 15:46 Sylvain.Pion
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030518193600.11972.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=pcarlini@unitus.it \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).