From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-35961-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1227 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 00:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1205 invoked by uid 71); 19 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030519000600.1204.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: bootstrap/9631: [hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu] [gcc-3.2.2] fails to bootstrap
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02049.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/9631; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: "Randolph Chung" <randolph@tausq.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Dara Hazeghi" <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/9631: [hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu] [gcc-3.2.2] fails to bootstrap
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 02:03:10 +0200

 Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org> wrote:
 
 > Same thing with gcc-3.3 release:
 >
 > /home/tausq/build/build-3.3/gcc/xgcc -B/home/tausq/build/build-3.3/gcc/
 > -B/opt/palinux/hppa64-linux/bin/ -B/opt/palinux/hppa64-linux/lib/ -isystem
 > /opt/palinux/hppa64-linux/include -O2  -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE   -W -Wall
 > -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -isystem
 ./include
 > -fPIC -Dpa64=1 -DELF=1 -g  -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED
 > -Dinhibit_libc -I. -I. -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/.
 > -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/config -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/../include -fexceptions -c
 > ../../gcc-3.3/gcc/unwind-sjlj.c -o libgcc/./unwind-sjlj.o
 > ../../gcc-3.3/gcc/unwind-sjlj.c:56: error: size of array `data' is too
 > large
 
 Ok. Would you please send us a preprocessed source reproducing the bug
 (basically, just add -E to that line)? You should verify that the preprocess
 source still confuse the same stage 1 compiler (build-3.3/gcc/xgcc) and
 start cutting down the command line down to the minimum to still get the
 error. Let us know that minimal command line as well.
 
 After that, it would help if you could try the same preprocessed file and
 the same command line with a fully built GCC on the same platform. Is it
 possible to build GCC 3.3 at all on that platform (maybe tweaking the
 configure line)? Otherwise, at least try with the newest version of GCC you
 can build.
 
 Thanks.
 Giovanni Bajo