From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17564 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 04:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17549 invoked by uid 71); 19 May 2003 04:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 04:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030519043601.17548.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: snyder Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC Reply-To: snyder X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02051.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/10213; it has been noted by GNATS. From: snyder To: Jan Hubicka Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jh@suse.cz, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC Date: 18 May 2003 23:32:34 -0500 hi - >Jan Hubicka writes: >Can you point me to the patch? I was off for a while and missed the >thread. In case the fast prologues was disabled, I would like to fix >the real problem instead. I think this is the patch that i was remembering: Thu Apr 3 00:18:49 CEST 2003 Jan Hubicka * i386.c (override_options): Disable red zone by default on i386. (compute_frame_layout, ix86_force_to_memory, ix86_free_from_memory): Do not test TARGET_64BIT together with TARGET_RED_ZONE I admit i never looked at the actual code, though, to be sure of what it was doing. When i saw that appear in the changelog, i thought that it was a reaction to the bug that i had reported... sss