public inbox for
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <>
Subject: Re: c++/10852: Old for-scoping rules improperly used?
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c++/10852; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <>
Subject: Re: c++/10852: Old for-scoping rules improperly used?
Date: 19 May 2003 10:15:54 +0200 writes:
 | I think this is a bug in g++; but there is always the possibility that it is a bug in my understanding of C++. In the following code gcc assumes that the variable i at the end of function is the same as in the for loop and produces the following error:
 | In function `void f()':
 | error: name lookup of `i' changed for new ISO `for' scoping
 | error:   using obsolete binding at `i'
 That is a bug in the compiler.
 The compiler should first look into X before complaining.
 -- Gaby

             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-19  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-19  8:32 Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-19 14:12 bangerth
2003-05-19  7:46 derrick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).