From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13480 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 13:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13433 invoked by uid 71); 19 May 2003 13:56:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 13:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030519135602.13425.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC Reply-To: Jan Hubicka X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02083.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/10213; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jan Hubicka To: snyder Cc: Jan Hubicka , bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/10213: [3.4 regression] optimization problem with ix86 fast prologue with -O2 -fPIC Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:51:43 +0200 > > hi - > > >Jan Hubicka writes: > >Can you point me to the patch? I was off for a while and missed the > >thread. In case the fast prologues was disabled, I would like to fix > >the real problem instead. > > I think this is the patch that i was remembering: > > Thu Apr 3 00:18:49 CEST 2003 Jan Hubicka > > * i386.c (override_options): Disable red zone by default on i386. > (compute_frame_layout, ix86_force_to_memory, ix86_free_from_memory): > Do not test TARGET_64BIT together with TARGET_RED_ZONE > > > I admit i never looked at the actual code, though, to be sure > of what it was doing. When i saw that appear in the changelog, > i thought that it was a reaction to the bug that i had reported... I see, that patch disable red zone on i386, where one can't use it but not for x86-64, so the code path is not dead. The bugreport is ineed solved and can be closed. Thanks! Honza > > sss