From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11911 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 14:51:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11880 invoked by uid 48); 19 May 2003 14:51:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030519145118.11879.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, law@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, law@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10862: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02089.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->law Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 19 14:51:18 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Jeff, you had been doing the tree-ssa C++ stuff, right? Or is there someone else whom I could bother? Besides, apart from this one and 10863 (which triggers _really_ frequent on my code), the tree-ssa branch seems to be in pretty good shape -- thanks! W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10862