From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25212 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 16:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25180 invoked by uid 71); 19 May 2003 16:06:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030519160600.25179.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Bernd Trog Subject: Re: inline-asm/10857: Inlining a function with inline-asm: "error: impossible constraint in `asm'" Reply-To: Bernd Trog X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02098.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/10857; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bernd Trog To: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: inline-asm/10857: Inlining a function with inline-asm: "error: impossible constraint in `asm'" Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT) > You can request these optimizations with the various -O > flags and in this case the code compiles. Not for me. (gcc-3.3.0, tried: -Os, -O1, -O3) Would you please describe your environment? The code compiles on gcc version 3.3 20030127 (prerelease). (with inline-asm warnings) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com