public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jmortensen@cfl.rr.com
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: middle-end/10875: There is no multiple symbol definition error or warning for global symbols
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030519220253.3946.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1394 bytes --]


>Number:         10875
>Category:       middle-end
>Synopsis:       There is no multiple symbol definition error or warning for global symbols
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon May 19 22:06:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jose Mortensen
>Release:        gcc 3.2.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
debian linux 2.4.19, HPUX B.10.20 (gcc 2.95.2)
>Description:
Two globals with the same name but different types declared in different files are resolved by the linker as one variable without an error or warning message. 

1.	Conflicting types should give an error. I don’t know if this is actually allowed  in ansi-C 
2.	Looks like Ansi-C takes this kind of code as declaration if it has already been defined, but would be handy if it could at least give a warning.

A simplified example is given below:

// file1.c
 
#include <stdio.h>

int* var;

void other_function(){
   var = NULL;
}


// file2.c

#include <stdio.h>
void other_function();

int var;

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
   var = 1;
   other_function();
   printf("%d\n", var);
}

>How-To-Repeat:
just cut and paste the code given above and run gcc

> gcc file1.c file2.c
>Fix:
coding carefully
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


                 reply	other threads:[~2003-05-19 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030519220253.3946.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=jmortensen@cfl.rr.com \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).