From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-36033-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13470 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 22:07:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12777 invoked by uid 48); 19 May 2003 22:06:50 -0000
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030519220650.12776.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  law@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, law@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10862: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02121.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon May 19 22:06:49 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Jeff already fixed it. Thanks a lot!
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10862