From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7006 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 00:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6991 invoked by uid 71); 20 May 2003 00:36:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030520003601.6986.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Ted Merrill Subject: Re: target/6260: [ARM/Thumb] gcc 3.04 -O4 thumb bug Reply-To: Ted Merrill X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02125.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/6260; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ted Merrill To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: target/6260: [ARM/Thumb] gcc 3.04 -O4 thumb bug Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:28:54 -0700 (PDT) I suppose you should close this bug report out. Using gcc 3.2.0, the code generated is very different than it was for gcc 3.0.4 . I'm not sure why we used -O4; apparently this is identical to -O3. We've been using -O2 only (for ARM/thumb target); perhaps we should try -O3 sometime again but unfortunately i don't have time now... Thanks Ted Merrill ArrayComm, Inc. On Sat, 17 May 2003, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > trail&database=gcc&pr=6260 > > Hello, > > this bug is rather old. Would it be possible for you to test with a > newer version of gcc to see if the problem still occurs? Thanks, > > Dara >