public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: RE: optimization/8474: -mcpu=i686 produces much faster code than -mcpu=pentium4 on a P4 machine
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030520004601.28986.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8474; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: Dave <davejf@starband.net>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: optimization/8474: -mcpu=i686 produces much faster code than -mcpu=pentium4 on a P4 machine
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:38:50 -0700 (PDT)

 --- Dave <davejf@starband.net> wrote:
 > New results are attached - sorry for the delay (been
 > busy lately).
 
 No problem. It doesn't look like the problem is
 solved, so I guess we'll leave the PR open, and hope
 somebody notices it...
 
 Thanks for your feedback,
 
 Dara
 
 > 
 > These were run on Red Hat 9 (I installed that rather
 > than Mandrake v9.1)
 > rather than the original RH 8 system.
 > 
 > Doesn't seem to be any improvement for P4 or with
 > gcc 3.4.
 > 
 > - Dave
 > 
 > On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 19:43, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
 > > Doh, I forgot to statically link the 3.4 ones (new
 > > version of libstdc++). Just a sec...
 > > 
 > > Here, I statically linked them (the 3.4 ones) this
 > > time.
 > > 
 > > Dara
 > > 
 > whetstone took: 1.05 secs for 952 MFLOPS (w/  math
 > lib)
 > whetstone took: 0.39 secs for 2564 MFLOPS (w/o math
 > lib)
 > 
 > whet33p4
 > whetstone took: 1.04 secs for 962 MFLOPS (w/  math
 > lib)
 > whetstone took: 0.40 secs for 2500 MFLOPS (w/o math
 > lib)
 > 
 > whet34p3
 > whetstone took: 1.05 secs for 952 MFLOPS (w/  math
 > lib)
 > whetstone took: 0.40 secs for 2500 MFLOPS (w/o math
 > lib)
 > 
 > whet34p4
 > whetstone took: 1.06 secs for 943 MFLOPS (w/  math
 > lib)
 > whetstone took: 0.39 secs for 2564 MFLOPS (w/o math
 > lib)
 > 
 > 
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com


             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-20  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-20  0:46 Dara Hazeghi [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-21  9:28 ehrhardt
2003-05-14 10:26 giovannibajo
2003-05-13 18:46 Dara Hazeghi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030520004601.28986.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=dhazeghi@yahoo.com \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).