public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030520161601.20593.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, <lloyd@acm.jhu.edu>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with
-O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 10:26:37 -0500 (CDT)
> It does not fail for me though on i686-pc-linux-gnu with GCC: 3.4
> 20030517 (experimental).
> Or on i686-unkown-openbsd3.1 with gcc version 3.4 20030519
> (experimental).
OK, I made the experiment -- and my small snippet still segfaults with
both 3.3 and 3.4 checked out an hour or so ago. This is the assembler
output I get on my system with present 3.4. I think I'm at a loss for
further explanations, but feel free to ask me if you think you have a
theory...
W.
.file "y.cc"
.globl i
.bss
.align 4
.type i, @object
.size i, 4
i:
.zero 4
.text
.align 2
.p2align 4,,15
.globl _Z5get_xv
.type _Z5get_xv, @function
_Z5get_xv:
.LFB4:
call .LPR0
addl $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %eax
pushl %ebp
.LCFI0:
movl i@GOT(%eax), %edx
movl %esp, %ebp
.LCFI1:
popl %ebp
movl (%edx), %eax
ret
.LFE4:
.size _Z5get_xv, .-_Z5get_xv
.align 2
.p2align 4,,15
.globl main
.type main, @function
main:
.LFB5:
pushl %ebp
.LCFI2:
movl %esp, %ebp
.LCFI3:
leal -8(%ebp), %eax
pushl %ebx
.LCFI4:
subl $4, %esp
.LCFI5:
andl $-16, %esp
call .LPR3
addl $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %ebx
movl i@GOT(%ebx), %ecx
movl %eax, (%ecx)
call _Z5get_xv@PLT
movl -4(%ebp), %ebx
xorl %eax, %eax
leave
ret
.LFE5:
.size main, .-main
.LPR0:
movl (%esp), %eax
ret
.LPR3:
movl (%esp), %ebx
ret
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.4 20030520 (experimental)"
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-20 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-20 16:16 Wolfgang Bangerth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-21 12:46 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 11:28 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 8:46 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-20 22:46 Janis Johnson
2003-05-20 19:36 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 19:27 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 19:16 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 17:16 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 17:06 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-20 17:06 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 13:56 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 2:06 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 1:16 bangerth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030520161601.20593.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=bangerth@ices.utexas.edu \
--cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).