public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030520161601.20593.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, <lloyd@acm.jhu.edu>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org> Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 10:26:37 -0500 (CDT) > It does not fail for me though on i686-pc-linux-gnu with GCC: 3.4 > 20030517 (experimental). > Or on i686-unkown-openbsd3.1 with gcc version 3.4 20030519 > (experimental). OK, I made the experiment -- and my small snippet still segfaults with both 3.3 and 3.4 checked out an hour or so ago. This is the assembler output I get on my system with present 3.4. I think I'm at a loss for further explanations, but feel free to ask me if you think you have a theory... W. .file "y.cc" .globl i .bss .align 4 .type i, @object .size i, 4 i: .zero 4 .text .align 2 .p2align 4,,15 .globl _Z5get_xv .type _Z5get_xv, @function _Z5get_xv: .LFB4: call .LPR0 addl $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %eax pushl %ebp .LCFI0: movl i@GOT(%eax), %edx movl %esp, %ebp .LCFI1: popl %ebp movl (%edx), %eax ret .LFE4: .size _Z5get_xv, .-_Z5get_xv .align 2 .p2align 4,,15 .globl main .type main, @function main: .LFB5: pushl %ebp .LCFI2: movl %esp, %ebp .LCFI3: leal -8(%ebp), %eax pushl %ebx .LCFI4: subl $4, %esp .LCFI5: andl $-16, %esp call .LPR3 addl $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %ebx movl i@GOT(%ebx), %ecx movl %eax, (%ecx) call _Z5get_xv@PLT movl -4(%ebp), %ebx xorl %eax, %eax leave ret .LFE5: .size main, .-main .LPR0: movl (%esp), %eax ret .LPR3: movl (%esp), %ebx ret .ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.4 20030520 (experimental)"
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-20 16:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-05-20 16:16 Wolfgang Bangerth [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-05-21 12:46 Christian Ehrhardt 2003-05-21 11:28 Christian Ehrhardt 2003-05-21 8:46 Christian Ehrhardt 2003-05-20 22:46 Janis Johnson 2003-05-20 19:36 Andrew Pinski 2003-05-20 19:27 Andrew Pinski 2003-05-20 19:16 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-05-20 17:16 Andrew Pinski 2003-05-20 17:06 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-05-20 17:06 Christian Ehrhardt 2003-05-20 13:56 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-05-20 2:06 Andrew Pinski 2003-05-20 1:16 bangerth
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030520161601.20593.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=bangerth@ices.utexas.edu \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).