From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29631 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 17:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29598 invoked by uid 71); 20 May 2003 17:06:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030520170600.29597.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86 Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02186.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Christian Ehrhardt" To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: Andrew Pinski , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, lloyd@acm.jhu.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:00:33 +0200 On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:26:37AM -0500, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > OK, I made the experiment -- and my small snippet still segfaults with > both 3.3 and 3.4 checked out an hour or so ago. This is the assembler > output I get on my system with present 3.4. I think I'm at a loss for > further explanations, but feel free to ask me if you think you have a > theory... Feeding this assembler file into gcc 3.2 on an Intel box works for me and the program doesn't crash! This might mean that we have an assembler/binutils problem here. Gruesse Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS!