Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>,
   Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <lloyd@acm.jhu.edu>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:14:22 -0400

 I can reproduce it with `GNU assembler 2.11.93.0.2 20020207' tough so  
 it looks like it binutils fault but it has already been fixed.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 
 On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 13:08 US/Eastern, Andrew Pinski wrote:
 
 > Mine is the top of the tree from the fsf's tree:
 > GNU assembler 2.14.90 20030520
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Andrew Pinski
 >
 > On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 13:05 US/Eastern, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
 >
 >>
 >>> Feeding this assembler file into gcc 3.2 on an Intel box works for me
 >>> and the program doesn't crash! This might mean that we have an
 >>> assembler/binutils problem here.
 >>
 >> Whereas if I do the same, it crashes. So you seem to have a point :-)
 >>
 >> My binutils are
 >>   2.11.92.0.10 20011021 (SuSE)
 >> (this is what SuSE shipped with 8.0). What do you have?
 >>
 >> W.
 >>
 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 >> ---
 >> Wolfgang Bangerth              email:             
 >> bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
 >>                                www:  
 >> http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 >